• Mike DeLawder
  • Jesse Link

Game parameters comparison

Mike DeLawder vs Jesse Link
Pocketing 77.42%No data+8.39% 
Runouts 20.00%No data+90.00% 
Average run 2.85No data+17.35% 
Break quality 60.00%No data+50.00% 
Safety quality 40.00%No data+100.00% 
Position play 1.96No data+54.76% 

match parameters

Pocketing -14.57%No datafrom the average 90.62%
Runouts +53.93%No datafrom the average 12.99%
Average run -7.23%No datafrom the average 3.07
Break quality +20.61%No datafrom the average 49.75%
Safety quality -19.22%No datafrom the average 49.52%
Position play +6.05%No datafrom the average 1.85

Average impact parameters

Mike DeLawder vs Jesse Link
Shot speed 0.39No data-22.06% 
Shot distance 0.83 mNo data+21.83% 
Shot duration 13.94 sNo data-19.98% 
Shot complexity 1.02No data-17.82% 
2021 Q-Ball Billiards Jacksonville, FL Amateur 9-Ball image

2021 Q-Ball Billiards Jacksonville, FL Amateur 9-Ball

  • Country
  • Game
    9
  • Match date
  • Match duration
    00:40:09

Rivals

62Shots56
5Breaks5
00:14:24Table time00:16:15
20Inning21
4Score7
2021 Q-Ball Billiards Jacksonville, FL Amateur 9-Ball image

2021 Q-Ball Billiards Jacksonville, FL Amateur 9-Ball

  • Country
  • Game
    9
  • Match date
  • Match duration
    00:40:09

Rivals

62Shots56
5Breaks5
00:14:24Table time00:16:15
20Inning21
4Score7

Game parameters comparison

Mike DeLawder vs Jesse Link
Pocketing 77.42%No data+8.39% 
Runouts 20.00%No data+90.00% 
Average run 2.85No data+17.35% 
Break quality 60.00%No data+50.00% 
Safety quality 40.00%No data+100.00% 
Position play 1.96No data+54.76% 

match parameters

Pocketing -14.57%No datafrom the average 90.62%
Runouts +53.93%No datafrom the average 12.99%
Average run -7.23%No datafrom the average 3.07
Break quality +20.61%No datafrom the average 49.75%
Safety quality -19.22%No datafrom the average 49.52%
Position play +6.05%No datafrom the average 1.85

Average impact parameters

Mike DeLawder vs Jesse Link
Shot speed 0.39No data-22.06% 
Shot distance 0.83 mNo data+21.83% 
Shot duration 13.94 sNo data-19.98% 
Shot complexity 1.02No data-17.82%