• Vladimir Matvienko
  • Ruslan Chinakhov

Game parameters comparison

Vladimir Matvienko  vs Ruslan Chinakhov
Pocketing 68.42%No data-7.14% 
Runouts 33.33%No data+16.67% 
Average run 2.43No data+36.61% 
Break quality 50.00%No datasame 
Safety quality 50.00%No datasame 
Position play 1.24No data+17.01% 

match parameters

Pocketing -28.02%No datafrom the average 95.06%
Runouts +233.85%No datafrom the average 9.98%
Average run -28.67%No datafrom the average 3.40
Break quality -7.57%No datafrom the average 54.09%
Safety quality -21.55%No datafrom the average 63.74%
Position play -47.49%No datafrom the average 2.37

Average impact parameters

Vladimir Matvienko  vs Ruslan Chinakhov
Shot speed 0.34No data-49.76% 
Shot distance 0.79 mNo data+13.54% 
Shot duration 32.89 sNo data+64.91% 
Shot complexity 1.23No data+23.09% 
2020 Russian Man 10-ball Pool Championship image

2020 Russian Man 10-ball Pool Championship

  • Country
  • Game
    10
  • Match date
  • Match duration
    00:21:25

Rivals

19Shots19
2Breaks3
00:10:25Table time00:06:19
7Inning9
0Score0
2020 Russian Man 10-ball Pool Championship image

2020 Russian Man 10-ball Pool Championship

  • Country
  • Game
    10
  • Match date
  • Match duration
    00:21:25

Rivals

19Shots19
2Breaks3
00:10:25Table time00:06:19
7Inning9
0Score0

Game parameters comparison

Vladimir Matvienko  vs Ruslan Chinakhov
Pocketing 68.42%No data-7.14% 
Runouts 33.33%No data+16.67% 
Average run 2.43No data+36.61% 
Break quality 50.00%No datasame 
Safety quality 50.00%No datasame 
Position play 1.24No data+17.01% 

match parameters

Pocketing -28.02%No datafrom the average 95.06%
Runouts +233.85%No datafrom the average 9.98%
Average run -28.67%No datafrom the average 3.40
Break quality -7.57%No datafrom the average 54.09%
Safety quality -21.55%No datafrom the average 63.74%
Position play -47.49%No datafrom the average 2.37

Average impact parameters

Vladimir Matvienko  vs Ruslan Chinakhov
Shot speed 0.34No data-49.76% 
Shot distance 0.79 mNo data+13.54% 
Shot duration 32.89 sNo data+64.91% 
Shot complexity 1.23No data+23.09%