• Justin Espinosa
  • Jon Giles

Game parameters comparison

Justin Espinosa vs Jon Giles
Pocketing 79.25%No data+10.38% 
Runouts 22.22%No data+300.00% 
Average run 2.76No data+18.49% 
Break quality 50.00%No data+16.67% 
Safety quality 33.33%No data-55.56% 
Position play 1.60No data+32.94% 

match parameters

Pocketing -15.51%No datafrom the average 93.79%
Runouts +96.67%No datafrom the average 11.30%
Average run -9.04%No datafrom the average 3.04
Break quality +38.49%No datafrom the average 36.10%
Safety quality -54.59%No datafrom the average 73.41%
Position play -16.71%No datafrom the average 1.92

Average impact parameters

Justin Espinosa vs Jon Giles
Shot speed 0.42No data-24.70% 
Shot distance 0.62 mNo data-15.68% 
Shot duration 21.52 sNo data-49.57% 
Shot complexity 1.21No data+3.88% 
2022 Poison Lone Star Tour Stop 4 / San Antonio, TX image

2022 Poison Lone Star Tour Stop 4 / San Antonio, TX

  • Country
  • Game
    9
  • Match date
  • Match duration
    01:04:17

Rivals

53Shots39
6Breaks4
00:19:00Table time00:27:44
17Inning15
6Score4
2022 Poison Lone Star Tour Stop 4 / San Antonio, TX image

2022 Poison Lone Star Tour Stop 4 / San Antonio, TX

  • Country
  • Game
    9
  • Match date
  • Match duration
    01:04:17

Rivals

53Shots39
6Breaks4
00:19:00Table time00:27:44
17Inning15
6Score4

Game parameters comparison

Justin Espinosa vs Jon Giles
Pocketing 79.25%No data+10.38% 
Runouts 22.22%No data+300.00% 
Average run 2.76No data+18.49% 
Break quality 50.00%No data+16.67% 
Safety quality 33.33%No data-55.56% 
Position play 1.60No data+32.94% 

match parameters

Pocketing -15.51%No datafrom the average 93.79%
Runouts +96.67%No datafrom the average 11.30%
Average run -9.04%No datafrom the average 3.04
Break quality +38.49%No datafrom the average 36.10%
Safety quality -54.59%No datafrom the average 73.41%
Position play -16.71%No datafrom the average 1.92

Average impact parameters

Justin Espinosa vs Jon Giles
Shot speed 0.42No data-24.70% 
Shot distance 0.62 mNo data-15.68% 
Shot duration 21.52 sNo data-49.57% 
Shot complexity 1.21No data+3.88%