• John Souders
  • Mike DeLawder

Game parameters comparison

John Souders vs Mike DeLawder
Pocketing 59.26%No data-2.30% 
Runouts 0.00%No datasame 
Average run 1.92No data-0.41% 
Break quality 25.00%No data-58.33% 
Safety quality 63.16%No data+5.26% 
Position play 1.08No data+15.09% 

match parameters

Pocketing -30.86%No datafrom the average 85.71%
Runouts sameNo datafrom the average 0.00%
Average run -7.69%No datafrom the average 2.08
Break quality -12.50%No datafrom the average 28.57%
Safety quality -36.84%No datafrom the average 100.00%
Position play +100%No datafrom the average NaN

Average impact parameters

John Souders vs Mike DeLawder
Shot speed 0.41No data-12.48% 
Shot distance 0.70 mNo data-13.35% 
Shot duration 25.54 sNo data+77.22% 
Shot complexity 0.83No data-20.82% 
2021 Q-Ball Billiards Jacksonville, FL Amateur 9-Ball image

2021 Q-Ball Billiards Jacksonville, FL Amateur 9-Ball

  • Country
  • Game
    9
  • Match date
  • Match duration
    00:48:17

Rivals

54Shots61
4Breaks5
00:22:59Table time00:14:39
26Inning29
3Score7
2021 Q-Ball Billiards Jacksonville, FL Amateur 9-Ball image

2021 Q-Ball Billiards Jacksonville, FL Amateur 9-Ball

  • Country
  • Game
    9
  • Match date
  • Match duration
    00:48:17

Rivals

54Shots61
4Breaks5
00:22:59Table time00:14:39
26Inning29
3Score7

Game parameters comparison

John Souders vs Mike DeLawder
Pocketing 59.26%No data-2.30% 
Runouts 0.00%No datasame 
Average run 1.92No data-0.41% 
Break quality 25.00%No data-58.33% 
Safety quality 63.16%No data+5.26% 
Position play 1.08No data+15.09% 

match parameters

Pocketing -30.86%No datafrom the average 85.71%
Runouts sameNo datafrom the average 0.00%
Average run -7.69%No datafrom the average 2.08
Break quality -12.50%No datafrom the average 28.57%
Safety quality -36.84%No datafrom the average 100.00%
Position play +100%No datafrom the average NaN

Average impact parameters

John Souders vs Mike DeLawder
Shot speed 0.41No data-12.48% 
Shot distance 0.70 mNo data-13.35% 
Shot duration 25.54 sNo data+77.22% 
Shot complexity 0.83No data-20.82%